This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Add to Saved Citations Download to citation manager Request Permissions Request Reprints Add to My Marked Citations Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Citing Articles via Scopus Google Scholar Articles by Rogers, K. B. Search for Related Content Social Bookmarking                         What's this?

Using Current Research To Make "Good" Decisions About Grouping

University of St. Thomas, St. Paul, Minn.

High-abitity and gifted students tend to benefit most from like-ability grouping, because the strategy provides them with the opportunity to access more advanced knowledge and skills and to practice deeper processing. Most likely, this access can be provided when instructors are not forced to divide their teaching energies and efforts among widely diverse tevels of ability and achievement.

NASSP Bulletin, Vol. 82, No. 595, 38-46 (1998)
DOI: 10.1177/019263659808259506


CiteULike    Complore    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter    What's this?

This article has been cited by other articles:

				J. VanTassel-Baska Leadership for the Future in Gifted Education: Presidential Address, NAGC 2006 Gifted Child Quarterly, January 1, 2007; 51(1): 5 - 10. [PDF]

				S. J. Armstrong and V. Priola Individual Differences in Cognitive Style and their Effects on Task and Social Orientations of Self-Managed Work Teams Small Group Research, June 1, 2001; 32(3): 283 - 312. [Abstract] [PDF]

				J. VanTassel-Baska Curriculum Policy Development for Secondary Gifted Programs: A Prescription for Reform Coherence NASSP Bulletin, April 1, 2000; 84(615): 14 - 29. [Abstract] [PDF]