Advanced Search

Journal Navigation

Journal Home

Subscriptions

Archive

Contact Us

Table of Contents

CiteULike is a free service for managing and discovering scholarly references - click here to get started.

Sign In to gain access to subscriptions and/or personal tools.
NASSP Bulletin
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to Saved Citations
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrowRequest Permissions
Right arrow Request Reprints
Right arrow Add to My Marked Citations
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Right arrow Citing Articles via Scopus
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Davis, S. H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
Add to CiteULike   Add to Complore   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us   Add to Digg   Add to Reddit   Add to Technorati   Add to Twitter  
What's this?

The Principal's Paradox: Remaining Secure in A Precarious Position

Stephen H. Davis

University of the Pacific, Stockton, Calif.

Many educators maintain that the principalship is the most demanding of all public school administrative roles. At best, principals strive to provide vision and unity of purpose within challenging, dynamic, and highly political settings. At worst, principals are faced with the unre lenting task of maintaining structure and order within increasingly hostile, unpredictable, and conflict-laden environments.

NASSP Bulletin, Vol. 81, No. 592, 73-80 (1997)
DOI: 10.1177/019263659708159212
Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Complore Complore   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
 REVIEW OF EDUCATIONAL RESEARCHHome page
S. J. Zepeda and R. S. Mayers
An Analysis of Research on Block Scheduling
Review of Educational Research, January 1, 2006; 76(1): 137 - 170.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 NASSP BulletinHome page
C. W. Lewis, J. J. Dugan, M. A. Winokur, and R. B. Cobb
The Effects of Block Scheduling on High School Academic Achievement
NASSP Bulletin, December 1, 2005; 89(645): 72 - 87.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 NASSP BulletinHome page
L. Flynn, F. Lawrenz, and M. J. Schultz
Block Scheduling and Mathematics: Enhancing Standards-Based Instruction?
NASSP Bulletin, March 1, 2005; 89(642): 14 - 23.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 NASSP BulletinHome page
D. Lare, A. M. Jablonski, and M. Salvaterra
Block Scheduling: Is It Cost-Effective?
NASSP Bulletin, March 1, 2002; 86(630): 54 - 71.
[Abstract] [PDF]

Home page
 NASSP BulletinHome page
L. C. Stokes and J. W. Wilson
A Longitudinal Study of Teachers' Perceptions of the Effectiveness of Block Versus Traditional Scheduling
NASSP Bulletin, November 1, 2000; 84(619): 90 - 99.
[Abstract] [PDF]